Animals are chosen to be the living organisms where particular medicinal discoveries are tried. Mar 7, Vivisection is a social evil because if it advances human knowledge, it does so at the cost of human character. The disadvantage of animal research is that it lessens the value of life.
The Pros and Cons Rats share certain similarities with the human biology. Animal testing may provide safety benefits for new products, but some of the items that are tested will never be used.
Imagine what would have happened if aspirin was completely taken off the pharmaceutical list? Humans and animals are also biologically similar, having the same set of organs, bloodstream and central nervous system, which is why they are affected with the same diseases and health conditions.
That means there are more than 20 million animals who could be at a high risk of abuse or neglect in the name of research. Consequently, numerous tests on animals have led to path breaking discoveries in medical science.
Unless there is accurate and complete oversight over the current field of animal research, this threat to the data will always exist. The product may harm or benefit the animal, but not a human.
Additionally, the animals used in the experiments are in captivity, and may be harmed or killed. And, when testing for adverse reactions, administering small doses on humans, also known as microdosing, also offers an alternative.
It is important to ask why we are ethically entitled to value human lives above animal lives.
But when it comes to the right of animals, there are particular things that you might consider thinking. I see another soul like me.
Arguments on each side certainly have their compelling strengths. Scientists are suggesting to find a cure for cancer by trying all experiments on animals. When a cure to a disease is discovered while working with animals, at least that test subject served a purpose that helped humanity, even if the results were not positive in the short term for the animal population.
A mouse may react positively to a treatment while a bird may have a negative reaction. Animals go through severe pain during the tests.
The future of animal research will depend upon the cost-benefit analysis and also, the possible creation of non-animal alternatives. Opponents argue that there is really no evidence of its vital role in major medical advances. Through animal research, the legality of accidentally causing the death of an animal is very different than what would occur with the accidental death of a human.
How do you feel about the process of animal research?
The same thing is true when using artificial human skin as a test subject, instead of animal skin. What about the use of computer models? By dividing the dosage into an amount too small to cause any adverse reactions, we can get a good idea of how humans would react to a drug without subjecting them to any risk.
This problem is only more significant when considering experiments done on animals like mice and fish. Embryos of different animals are injected into a different animal's body.
Animals make poor test subjects This statement is a direct contradiction from what proponents believe about how closely related animals and humans are anatomically and biologically, because of the many metabolic, cellular, and anatomical differences between the two species.
In this way, humans may be prevented from the harms that are caused to the animals during the testing. Research animals must be provided with shelter that follows minimum housing standards, such as the right-sized enclosure, recommended temperature, access to clean food and water, etc.
Even rodents ratsthat are mostly used in cancer research, rarely have human form of cancer lung cancer etc. This is why animal testing is endorsed by the American Veterinary Medical Association. Organizations such as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals PETA have placed the opposition to animal research more clearly before the eyes of the public.
Aspirin, for example, was almost shelved because it proved dangerous for animals. This topic will always be debated among scholars, animal lovers, and scientists.On the contrary, animal research ethics and the integrity and morality of such tests have been questioned by environmentalists.
Pros PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) supporters will stand in unison against the support of animal testing. Any discussion of animal testing pros and cons must acknowledge that certain kinds of animal research involve subjecting creatures to what can aptly be described as torture.
Animal research is highly regulated, with laws in place to protect animals from mistreatment. In addition to local and state laws and guidelines, animal research has been regulated by the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA) since Pros of Animal Testing.
To decide whether animal testing is beneficial or not, it is best that you start learning its positive sides first like the following: Treatments Developed Have Saved Lives Animals are the most common subject of medical testing. This includes new drugs as well as possible cures for many different medical problems.
Jun 13, · Animal Testing Cons: What Every Person Should Know June 13, by April Klazema Animal testing is a process that has been going on for centuries for numerous reasons, such as developing medical treatments, determining the toxicity of certain medications, confirming the safety of a product designed for humans, and other health care joeshammas.com: April Klazema.
Recommended Posts. Alternative to FEGLI Option B. Recent Posts. Alcoholism and Verbal Abuse; Hyponatremia and Alcoholism.Download