Sevilla vs cardenas case digest

Pertinent provisions of the Civil Code which was the law in force at the time of the marriage of the parties are Articles 53, 10 58 11 and Thus, the certification to be issued by the Local Civil Registrar must categorically state that the document does not exist in his office or the particular entry could not be found in the register despite diligent search.

The Court is mindful of the policy of the Constitution to protect and strengthen the family as the basic autonomous social institution and marriage as the foundation of the family.

Such certification shall be sufficient proof of lack or absence of record as stated in Section 28, Rule of the Rules of Court: Thus, unless the presumption is rebutted, it becomes conclusive. In a Complaint 3 dated 28 March filed by Jaime O.

Upon verifications made by him through his lawyer, Atty.

Sevilla -v- Cardenas Markets, Inc.

It does not appear on record that the former custodian of the logbook was deceased or missing, or that his testimony could not be secured. Gonzales, a supposed Minister of the Gospel. When the branch office was opened, it was run by appellant Sevilla payable to TWS by any airline for any fare brought in on the efforts of Mrs.

After the civil wedding, they had lunch and later each went home separately. Sevilla before the RTC, he claimed that on 19 Maythrough machinations, duress and intimidation employed upon him by Carmelita N. Moreover, plaintiff preferred to have sex with her in between the knees which she called "intrafemural sex," while real sex between them The trial court made the following findings: A marriage license number was indicated in the contract, which Jaime never applied for.

It appears that Sevilla is a bona fide travel agent herself, and she acquired an interest in the business entrusted to her. It can also mean, as we believed true in the case at bar, that the logbook just cannot be found.

Thus, any doubt should be resolved in favor of the validity of the marriage. On the said date, the father of Carmelita caused him and Carmelita to sign a marriage contract before the said Minister of the Gospel. Marriage in this jurisdiction is not only a civil contract, but it is a new relation, an institution in the maintenance of which the public is deeply interested.

Proof of lack of record. The marriage between Carmelita and Jaime is of no exception. Consequently, every intendment of the law leans toward legalizing matrimony. It does not appear on record that the former custodian of the logbook was deceased or missing, or that his testimony could not be secured.

Plaintiff obtained a divorce decree against defendant in the United States in and later secured a judicial separation of their conjugal partnership in Carmelita filed an appeal with the Court of Appeals. The marriage between Carmelita and Jaime is of no exception.

Such certification shall be sufficient proof of lack or absence of record as stated in Section 28, Rule of the Rules of Court: Sevilla, told her not to worry.

The Court is mindful of the policy of the Constitution to protect and strengthen the family as the basic autonomous social institution and marriage as the foundation of the family. She learned from Dr. As custodians of public documents, civil registrars are public officers charged with the duty, inter alia, of maintaining a register book where they are required to enter all applications for marriage licenses, including the names of the applicants, the date the marriage license was issued and such other relevant data.

It was during this time when defendant's second son was born whose paternity plaintiff questioned. The above Rule authorized the custodian of documents to certify that despite diligent search, a particular document does not exist in his office or that a particular entry of a specified tenor was not to be found in a register.

Defendant Carmelita Cardenas testified that she and plaintiff had a steady romantic relationship after they met and were introduced to each other in October JAIME joeshammas.comA, petitioner, vs. value to the certifications issued by the Local Civil Registrar should be read in line with the decision in the earlier case of Republic v.

License No.

allegedly dated May 19, was issued by this Office to MR. JAIME O. SEVILLA and MS. CARMELITA CARDENAS-SEVILLA. Feb 26,  · G.R. No. July 31, JAIME joeshammas.comA, petitioner, joeshammas.comITA N.

Sevilla vs. CA Case Digest

CARDENAS, respondent. Facts: In a Complaint filed by Jaime O.

Sevilla v Cardena

Sevilla before the RTC, he claimed that on 19 Maythrough machinations, duress and intimidation employed upon him by Carmelita N. Cardenas and the latter's father, retired.

JAIME O. SEVILLA v. CARMELITA N. CARDENAS, GR NO.

Sevilla v Cardena

Facts: In a Complaint[3] dated 28 March filed by Jaime O. Sevilla before the RTC, he claimed that on 19 Maythrough machinations, duress and intimidation employed upon him by Carmelita N.

Cardenas and the latter's father, retired Colonel Jose Cardenas of the Armed forces of the Philippines, he and. G.R. No. July 31, JAIME joeshammas.comA, petitioner, vs.

CARMELITA N. CARDENAS, respondent. D E C I S I O N CHICO-NAZARIO, J.: This Petition for Review on Certiorari seeks the reversal of the Decision1 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. dated 20 December which set aside the Decision2 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Makati City, in Civil Case No.

94. Case Summary. On 07/30/ a Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury case was filed by Sevilla -v- Cardenas Markets Inc in the jurisdiction of San Bernardino County Superior Courts, San Bernardino District Courthouse Civil.

Sevilla vs. CA FACTS: A contract by and between Noguera and Tourist World Service (TWS), represented by Canilao, wherein TWS leased the premises belonging to Noguera as branch office of TWS.

When the branch office was opened, it was run by appellant Sevilla payable to TWS by any airline for any fare.

Download
Sevilla vs cardenas case digest
Rated 3/5 based on 8 review